Talk:SMS Bayern (1878)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll take this review on as well. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Criterion 1

 * The lead says the the Bayern was modernized in Stettin, while the Service history section claims that it was modernized in Danzig.
 * Should "Stollergrund" be wikilinked? (I found it in the Service history section)
 * Should be Danzig - not sure why I typed Stettin. There's no article for Stollergrund, but I suppose a redlink is fine (I checked the German wiki as well, and there's no article there either, FWIW). Parsecboy (talk) 11:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Criterion 2
The article is well-referenced using offline references, which I will accept in good faith. A separate ref section and inline citations are used. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 3
All sections covered by its contemporaries are included here. The article appears sufficiently focused and does not stray off topic very much. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 4
There were no blatant violations of neutrality in the article. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 5
Looks like you've been with this article from the beginning. Edit history checks out, and the article is stable. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 6
The copyright status of both images is documented and valid. Both the images and captions are relevant, and the captions concise. This criterion is a pass.

Overall comments
You are really good at these articles. :) Two comments involving prose to be resolved, and this one will be a pass. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've been writing them for over four years now :) In that time, I've gotten a lot of experience writing them. Parsecboy (talk) 11:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Those four years really have done you (and Wikipedia) well. I never even knew a 62 article topic was possible!
 * I'm passing this article momentarily. Again, good work! --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 16:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)