Talk:SMS Comet/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 20:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Review:
 * The toolbox checks out.
 * "an aviso, of the Imperial German Navy": no comma
 * Otherwise:
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * - Dank (push to talk) 23:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * There's that damn comma again. Many thanks, as always, Dan. Parsecboy (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * - Dank (push to talk) 23:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * There's that damn comma again. Many thanks, as always, Dan. Parsecboy (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * There's that damn comma again. Many thanks, as always, Dan. Parsecboy (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Passed - Dank (push to talk) 19:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)