Talk:SMS Emden/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 22:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I'll start this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No DABs, one external link needs minor correction.
 * Fixed.
 * Link light cruiser in the lede, commerce raider, (gun) shield.
 * Done.
 * Tell the reader that triple-expansion engines were steam engines.
 * Added.
 * Was she a light cruiser or a protected cruiser? The armored deck makes me think of the latter.
 * The situation is somewhat confused because the Germans didn't use that terminology - they only had grosse and klein cruisers. Conway's and Groener both call her a light cruiser. If anything, she would probably be best described as a light (or 2nd class) protected cruiser. Since neither of those are things, it's probably best to stick to "light cruiser".
 * Make sure to use a colon for all your times.
 * I think there was just the one, unless I missed another.
 * What kind of ship was Protector?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Added. Thanks for reviewing the article, Sturm. Parsecboy (talk) 01:25, 29 October 2013 (UTC)