Talk:SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria
: The article complies with MOS policies on layout and grammar. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article makes full use of the three reputable publications in its bibliography. No sign of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to sufficiently cover all encyclopedic aspects of its topic for which reliable information could be obtained. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article's tone remains neutral throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC) . Since its creation just over two months ago, this article has not endured any edit warring or similarly disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC) : Both images used in this article are public domain, thereby do not risk fair use violation. Both serve relevant illustrative purposes with regards to the topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

The article qualifies as GA, and it's about time this review was finished. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)