Talk:SMS Graf Spee

Move to SMS Graf Spee

 * Objection - this proposed move is not listed on Requested moves. -- Arwel (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've removed the move template. If a move is still required, please follow the instructions at WP:RM --Lox (t,c) 14:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This seemed to me to be an uncontroversial and unobstructed move that is permitted. Graf Spee was a person (the WWI admiral), while SMS Graf Spee was a ship named after him. The move seems to be a no-brainer.Cosal 16:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The move is likely to be uncontroversial, but was not unobstructed - I'm going to go ahead and list it now. --Lox (t,c) 17:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

In fact, since few people are likely to know Graf Spee's first name, it would also make sense to have the "Graf Spee" page point to the page "Maximilian von Spee".Cosal 16:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was to move this page

Graf Spee → SMS Graf Spee – {Conform to other titles in category and WP naming convention} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page

Voting

 * Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~ 


 * Support --Lox (t,c) 17:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - I only objected last time because it wasn't properly listed on WP:RM. - Arwel (talk) 20:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for clarifying and voting! --Lox (t,c) 21:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Olessi 20:51, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Add any additional comments


 * Comment While I don't consider this to be a controversial move, an objection was raised previously. I am therefore leaving it open to vote. This move would be to conform to other titles in the Category:World War I battleships of Germany and to follow Naming conventions (ships) --Lox (t,c) 17:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The move was performed. enochlau (talk) 02:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Disambiguation
I was going to add it myself, but it seems Arwel Parry has done it already, great job! --Lox (t,c) 10:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)