Talk:SMS Helgoland (1909)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):


 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:


 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * Having made a few minor mods to the text, quite happy to pass this - well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to review this Ian! Parsecboy (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)