Talk:SMS Hindenburg/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a very nice piece of work, as usual.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * aye
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * aye
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * aye
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * your usual fine work. I made a couple of very minor tweaks, relating to wordiness in the lead and consistency of numbers in the text.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * your usual fine work. I made a couple of very minor tweaks, relating to wordiness in the lead and consistency of numbers in the text.


 * Thanks, Auntieruth. Your review and copyedits are much appreciated. Parsecboy (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

WOW you're quick. I just did this. :) do you want to add the article to the appropriate lists?  Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I happened to see you make a few edits to the article, so I checked to see if you had created the review page :) I can add it to the list at WP:GA if you like. Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * sure go ahead--the fun part -- I think you already did it anyway. I've pulled it from the "reviews needed" section. Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)