Talk:SMS Kaiser Karl VI/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk · contribs) 09:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

starting shortly
 * is the use of template Infobox ship class overview intentional? Is Infobox ship career not a better choice? MisterBee1966 (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Good point - substituted.
 * was the namesake Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor?
 * Also a good suggestion - added. Parsecboy (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * check overlinking of Rear Admiral in "Service history" section
 * Good catch, fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 12:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: