Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1875)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will get back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Section 1

 * Para 1; The sentence She had a crew of 400 officers and men is a bit confusing. A reader may get an idea that it had 400 officers alone, and also men not including in these 400. Please correct this.
 * This is a pretty standard way to write this, and there's no good way to change it to fix what you suggest. See for instance FAs like Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano.

Section 2

 * Para 3; The sentence The ship's fate after entering Yugoslav service was abruptly cut with a full stop, not giving a information about the fate. Instead of a full stop, a semi colon would help.
 * Good catch, fixed.

Lead
All good, address these suggestions and will be good to go. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I suggest replacing the word "purportedly" with its synonym, because most of the standard dictionaries don't have a definition /meaning for the word.
 * This is a common word - I don't know where you looked, but it's in Merriam-Webster, the Cambridge Dictionary, and Dictionary.com (the only three I checked, surely its in others).
 * Thanks for your review. Parsecboy (talk) 09:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 10:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: