Talk:SMS Kaiserin/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: White Shadows  We live in a beautiful world 00:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):  The prose is good and the article does follow MOS. No issues here. With your permission, I changed the "Footnotes" section to just "Notes" as one of the subsections was already titled "Footnotes". Feel free to revert me but I only changed it to avoid confusion for the reader.
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  No issues here. Excellent as always.
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):  No sort of bias present.
 * It is stable.
 * No edit waring or issues with the content.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:

I'll be reviewing this GAN Parsec. After looking over her, I'll come back to you with any comments or questions ;)-- White Shadows We live in a beautiful world 00:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Everything checks out. I just need your OK for that one change I made and I'll pass this GAN.-- White Shadows We live in a beautiful world 03:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks fine to me. Thanks for reviewing the article, WS. Parsecboy (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright then. This article easily passes GAN. Good luck with any future work on this (ACR, FA) I'll be updating the article now....-- White Shadows We live in a beautiful world 03:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)