Talk:SMS Meteor (1865)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * - wonder if you've lost track of this? Parsecboy (talk) 13:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to take over this one -- give me a day or two... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Toolbox checks -- no dab or EL issues.

Prose -- copyedited a bit so let me know if I altered meaning accidentally; otherwise no concerns.

Structure -- in keeping with similar articles.

Detail -- seems sufficient for GA-level; no obvious or major gaps.

Images -- licensing looks fine for second image but I believe we need a US PD tag for the top one.

Referencing -- fully cited and no concerns with ref reliability; one formatting issue that I dealt with.

Summary -- ready to pass, just the image tag needed I think. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks Ian - I'd think the PD-US tag should work, as I don't think anyone would argue that Parlow was painting more than 22 years after he died ;) Parsecboy (talk) 12:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * - can you let me know if there's anything else that needs to be addressed? Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 12:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ugh, sorry Nate, this one slipped through the cracks -- passing now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:30, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * P.S. Glad it didn't affect the results of last month's contest -- I guess now you have a few points for this month's that you may not have planned on... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Very true! Thanks Ian :) Parsecboy (talk) 23:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)