Talk:SMS Preussen (1903)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
--Jim Sweeney (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) The text has - eighteen 8.8 cm (3.45 in) SK L/35 quick-firing guns and the inf box - 14 × 8.8 cm (3.5 in) guns (bet this does not crop up again)
 * 2) The footnote could use a cite
 * 3) Tarrant, V. E in the bibliography could use the publishers location added
 * All fixed. You know, you make one little mistake in one infobox and then copy it over to the other four articles...thanks for catching those :) Parsecboy (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Passed --Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)