Talk:SMS Schwaben/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
--Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) The text states there were six 45 cm (18 in) torpedo tubes while the inf box has 5 × 45 cm (17.7 in) torpedo tubes
 * 2) The footnote could use a cite
 * 3) The inf box has - Fate: Scrapped in 1920 but the text says - battleship was stricken from the naval register on 8 March 1921 needs clarification
 * All three fixed, thanks for reviewing the article, Jim. Parsecboy (talk) 11:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Passed --Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)