Talk:SMS Tegetthoff (1912)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 02:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * 1) Gun sizes could be standardised mm and cm both used in the text but only mm in the info box
 * Fixed.-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 22:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) The text has Twelve 66-millimetre (3 in)/50 K 10 guns - while the info box claims 18 × 70 mm (3 in) guns in single mountings
 * Fixed. Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Same with the torpedoes the text has  Four 21-inch (530 mm) submerged torpedo tubes - while the inf box has 4 × 533 mm (21 in) torpedo tubes
 * Fixed. Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) The Italian Air Force conducted at least eighty air raids on Pola between 1915 and 1917 which probably kept the crews of her anti-aircraft guns busy - is not very encyclopedic and speculative
 * Reworded.-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 22:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) The Post-war fate section is a bit sparse moved to Venice where she was shown as a war trophy by who ?
 * Added that she was shown as a war trophy by the Italians.-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 22:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) In 1924 and 1925, she was scrapped at La Spezia. was she scrapped twice ?
 * I'll clairfy that that is the total time scrapping, not two scrappings. Buggie111 (talk)


 * 1) What makes http://www.hicon.pl/~pothkan/hhwn/AH-Maj.html a reliable site ?'
 * Removed. Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This one still needs lookin at its still in teh article ref 1 --Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:01, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Same with http://croatian-treasure.com/prinz.html
 * 2) Same with http://croatian-treasure.com/ should this one not be an external link ?
 * Removed. Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Same question with this one http://www.naval-history.net/WW1NavyAustrian.htm
 * Thought you asked this at the OMT talk. Buggie111 (talk) 13:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Sokol, Anthony (1968). The Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian Navy. Annapolis: United States Naval Institute needs the ISBN added and should it be Naval Instutute Press ?
 * Will ping WS
 * Sokol's book was printed before ISBN numbers were given. It simply does not have one. Trust me, I own the book. I have fixed the publisher issues though.-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 23:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) The Post-war fate section is very small and may be better incorporated in the previous section
 * Have done so. Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) References 9 needs a publishing date for the Hungarian News Agency article
 * I believe that the 2008 date in parenthesis is the publishing date.-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 16:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) The first image in the Characteristics section causes a problem (GA criteria) Text should not be sandwiched between two adjacent images. and  #Left-aligned images should not be placed at the start of subsections
 * I understand what you are saying but this is the standard format for most battleship articles. Do you think that an exception can be made this time?-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 16:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Checking it looks about 50-50. Why not put that image at the top of the article like with Japanese battleship Kongō and the one there could replace the one of the sinking Szent which although mentioned in the text is a bit out of place. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) I was sure something was missing and its her armour which is not mentioned at all.
 * Added.-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 17:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 02:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * We were expecting User:NerdyScienceDude to review this, but it's no big deal. Sure, I'll take a look. Buggie111 (talk) 02:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Can you check this as it does not make sense. Her armament consisted of twelve 305-millimetre (12 in)/45-caliber K 10 guns in four triple turrets. Her secondary armament consisted of twelve 305-millimetre (12.0 in)/50 K 10 guns mounted in casemates amidships. Twelve 66-millimetre (3 in)/50 K 10 guns were mounted on open pivots on the upper deck above the casemates. Three more 66-mm K 10 guns were mounted on the upper turrets for anti-aircraft duties. Four 21-inch (530 mm) submerged torpedo tubes were fitted, one each in the bow, stern and on each broadside; twelve torpedoes were carried. and does not conform with the inf box --Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Buggie111 (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Passed GA --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)