Talk:SMS Victoria Louise/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 15:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. She was named for Princess Victoria Louise. Suggest - She was named after Princess Victoria Louise
 * Works for me. Thanks for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 15:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Passed. Good job Parsec. How many more German warships are their? Thurgate (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You'd think after 5 years, I'd be slowing down :) There are the rest of the protected cruisers, the light cruisers, the coastal defense ships, and the carriers to finish up, as far as major warships go. Sturmvogel has done a number of the WWII destroyers, which I probably won't ever get to. Parsecboy (talk) 16:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)