Talk:SMS Wörth/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Let me know if the changes made to Hela work and I can do something similar here.
 * That would work just fine.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * I think I've got all these. But as with Hela, the hyphens are only for full units, not the abbreviations per Tony's comment at the Bayern class FAC.
 * Actually I'd disagree; the hyphens are needed with or without the abbreviations, as per the convert template. But I'll look at the FAC and see what he said.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd missed these earlier, but many references need place of publication plus title and pages for the articles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I've got these now. Parsecboy (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Year and boiler # and type added.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Added.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Added.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: