Talk:SM U-12 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that once again this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with a suggestion for future development. This is not required to achieve GA standard, but might help in future A-class or FAC review process.--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "On 29 May, U-12 sank the Greek steamer Virginia, which was the only ship sunk by U-12." Is there a way to phrase this woithout using U-12 twice in one sentance?--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Changed it. Sometimes these are just embarrassing to me.... :) — Bellhalla (talk) 23:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail: