Talk:SM U-17 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I have elected to review this article against the Good article criteria, and should have my initial comments posted up within the next hour. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 04:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Following a review of this article against the GA criteria, I have found no issues that require further clarification or expansion. This article safely meets the GA criteria, and I will be promoting it as such. Congratulations and well done! However, I have left a few points below that may guide you if you wish to further expand this article or bring it further up the quality scale. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Further detail and information on the submarine's battle engagements would be great.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I presume no image is available of the submarine? If none is available, the infobox will suffice but it would be nice if one was included.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I presume no image is available of the submarine? If none is available, the infobox will suffice but it would be nice if one was included.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: