Talk:SM U-1 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Additonal comments

 * The link to Brioni does not go where you intended.
 * Whoops. I've fixed that so the link points to Brioni Island. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * For an article of this size, the lead is longer than is normal and could be summarised more consisely. However, this is not a significant problem and is only a matter of taste.
 * I tightened up the lead a bit so that it's more in line with the length of the article. Thanks again for the suggestions. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking the time to review the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)