Talk:SM U-23 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Pass Though I would cauition that the article needs more sources if it is to be further promoted. I know records from 1921 aren't necessarily easy to find and there really isn't a guideline on a "minimum" number of sources, I have seen articles failed on the basis that they rely too heavily on too few sources, which has the potential for bias and/or a lack of comprehensive coverage. For the purpose of a GA, though, I find the article to be sufficient.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass The article sufficiently covers the topic of this particular ship.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass Though again the issue above could be a potential problem if the article is to be promoted.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass The article is definately GA quality. Improve where possible and I would recommend trying to promote it further if you can. - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame)  21:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)