Talk:SM U-29 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References needed:
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * There are several fact tags. Please provide citations for them. Wandalstouring (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I believe I've addressed all of the tags. Please let me know if there are any more issues with the article meeting the GA criteria. Many thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)