Talk:SM U-3 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with a suggestion for future development. This is not required to achieve GA standard, but might help in future A-class or FAC review process.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * No images, although if one could be found it would improve things.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No images, although if one could be found it would improve things.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Additonal comments

 * Only a minor thing, but it might be interesting to have some more information on the unsuccessful cruises made by U-3 in 1914-15 before the commander was changed. It might also be good to comment on this change, is there any known reason for it (i.e. a lack of aggression by the previous commander). In any case, the early patrols and the change in command could be mentioned in the text.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)