Talk:SM UB-13/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):  - the sentences in the lede are quite short and staccato, but this is a personal preference that makes me note it, I think...
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  - I'm particularly taken with the three images here; a nice variation between different topics.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - well done! Shimgray | talk | 19:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  - I'm particularly taken with the three images here; a nice variation between different topics.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - well done! Shimgray | talk | 19:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - well done! Shimgray | talk | 19:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)