Talk:SOA4All

This article's copyright is perfectly in line with Wikipedia policy DCM. The orginal contributers are part of the project, as can be easily verified. The webpage mentioned is owned by the project described. Hence one should assume the content was put on Wikipedia under Wikipedia style of copyright license as stated in DCM. If there are doubts, this could be discussed with the contributors or on the article's discussion page. But I do not see evidence of either. So putting this article on a list for speedy deletion is not correct. Ademmen (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

This article should not have been put on the list for speedy deletion because of possible copyright violation. See CSD non-criterium 10 Ademmen (talk) 13:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Objecting proposed article deletion
Thank you for your remarks. The SOA4All article definitely needs major rewriting and updating in order to meet WP:GNG and solve any other pending issue. Several scientific publications and other sources exist that can prove SOA4All notability and results. That is why I removed the notice. I will take care of improving this article. ziomau (talk) 16:13, 1 August 2011 (UTC)