Talk:SOS Lynx

Speedy Deletion
I'll add more info about why the subject is important or significant. Phoenix of9 (talk) 21:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh btw, google returns 419,000 entries for SOSLynx Phoenix of9 (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Google hits really doesn't have any impact on deciding if a subject is notable. That being said, this page has very little content. If it is sufficiently expanded and the group can show sufficient notability while using reliable sources, I will personally remove the CSD tag. D ARTH P ANDA duel &bull;  work 22:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, maybe I should move the contents to Iberian Lynx but I'll try to find more info. What is the time limit? Phoenix of9 (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure the content should not be moved to Iberian Lynx as SOSLynx has no verifiable impact on the lynx. I'm going to assume good faith and just go ahead and remove the speedy with the belief that you will expand and source this page (effectively eliminating a "time limit"). Good luck! D ARTH P ANDA duel &bull;  work 22:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, thx... Phoenix of9 (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

This has had minimal expansion since the speedy tag was removed, and most links were inappropriate per WP:EL and WP:RS. I've proposed the merger into Iberian Lynx. -- Zim Zala Bim talk  15:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yea I didnt have the time. Explain tho, why the sources arent reliable. BBC isnt reliable? Phoenix of9 (talk) 17:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The BBC mention remains, but it was the direct link to a YouTube video, a press release, and a broken link that were removed per WP:EL and WP:RS. -- Zim Zala Bim talk  17:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yea sorry, didnt see your edits before the merger tag edit. I agree with the merger. Phoenix of9 (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)