Talk:SR 88

Quick Peer Review
This is a quick review to give points to help advance this article to B class and further. Much Ado,--MOLEY (talk) 02:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Intro is at a minimum and needs to be expanded
 * Needs more sources. Most citing comes from only one source.
 * A youtube video isn't a quality source along with a bare URL
 * Lack of image is unfortunate but understandable
 * Reads like an add and needs more information if possible
 * Good infobox with plenty of information