Talk:SR Lord Nelson class

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Again, a good article. Perhaps more wikiliking but not a pre-requisite of GA, so, pass. The Rambling Man 17:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC) Talk:SR Lord Nelson class/GA1 Talk:SR Lord Nelson class/GA2
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail: