Talk:SR Lord Nelson class/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:SR Lord Nelson class/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.


 * Where books or journals are being used as references, the relevant pages should also be given.


 * It's often easier to separate the References into Notes and Bibliography, to make it easier to provide references to different pages in the same book.


 * Imperial to metric conversions are given in the infobox, but not in the article body.


 * "This entailed the leading driving wheels jumping off the track, though the locomotive ran for many yards before they re-railed themselves over a point without the crew's knowledge." If the crew didn't know anything about it, then how is is known that it happened?

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 12:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Done, although not possible to convert angles to Metric. --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 23:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I was thinking of the mph, which I've fixed myself. Thanks for all the work you've done on this series of SR locomotives. This review is now closed as a keep. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)