Talk:SS Black Osprey/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * A few minor inconsistencies. Please choose on of the typographical varieties of "New York – Rotterdam" and "Baltimore–Antwerp". Why are some abbreviations encapsulated in small, and other regular size? This is a violation of the Mos, that also advises against periods—in particular where other non-punctuated abbreviations are used (such as the use of U.S. in this text).
 * Dash spacing fixed. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I've always followed the rule that acronyms or initialisms of four or more characters should be in small caps to avoid overwhelming the surrounding text. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Similarly, because the article is written in American English, I've used the more common "U.S." (with periods) for that abbreviation only. If there are any consistencies from my I intent, I'm happy to make changes. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If you insist this is within the realm of the MoS, it is fine for me. Arsenikk (talk)  20:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * One edit? Impressive.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A few small MoS details and the article will pass—put on hold on the mean time.
 * My replies interspersed above. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Passed. Congratulations with another Good Ship. Arsenikk (talk)  20:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A few small MoS details and the article will pass—put on hold on the mean time.
 * My replies interspersed above. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Passed. Congratulations with another Good Ship. Arsenikk (talk)  20:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)