Talk:SS Cygni

Need to revise distance
There's now a more accurate distance to SS Cygni, it now should read 370 lightyears (+/- some number for uncertainty, dunno what). see < http://scitechdaily.com/new-distance-measurement-of-ss-cygni-resolves-major-astronomical-mystery/ >. Could somebody who works with astronomy pages do this fix? thanks Lanephil (talk) 18:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Cleaned up a few other things as well, and took down both flags that were on the article.  Strictly speaking, there's a new position for the star that comes out of the new VLBI work, but it seems like overkill to update that. BSVulturis (talk) 21:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Contradictory mass data in infobox & prose
Compare the following:

The inclination of the system has been calculated to be about 50 degrees, yielding masses of 0.6 solar mass for the white dwarf primary star and 0.4  for the red dwarf secondary star. – Xingyzt (talk  &#124;  contribs) 00:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I've updated the article. How does it look now?  Lithopsian (talk) 11:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Probably a good call to use the more recent source, although AAVSO and some other summary sites still use the 1989 mass numbers. – Xingyzt (talk  &#124;  contribs) 10:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)