Talk:SS El Oriente/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The last three paragraphs of the "World War I" section are fairly short. Can they be combined in any way?
 * How does it look now?
 * In the lead, you say the ship was built in 1910 twice.
 * I removed the second one.
 * In the "World War II" section, third paragraph, you say "often by performed by Soviet women and political prisoners". Should the first "by" be removed?
 * Yes it should :), and now is removed.
 * In the "Red Cross ship" section, you have a set of refs out of numerical order.
 * Good catch. I think that was an artifact of the Did You Know? process.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * In the "World War I" section, fourth paragraph, the last sentence needs a ref
 * Added.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Another nice article. I'm putting it on hold to allow time to address the few concerns I detailed above. Dana boomer (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Replies above. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good - I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)