Talk:SS Panaman/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be conducting the GA review for this article, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In the second paragraph of the World War I section, you say "After sailing from France on 16 November, she arrived at Newport News eleven days later and underwent repairs." Do you know what the repairs were for?
 * I suppose just general voyage repairs, but the source doesn't elaborate. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * In the Interwar years section, do you know what the result of the trial for the mutineers was?
 * Newspaper searches didn't reveal the answer. The info may be out there somewhere, but I wasn't able to find it. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

The article looks very nice, except for the two minor issues I detailed above, so I am putting the article on hold. If you don't have the information to answer these questions, that's fine, but if you do, it would be nice to add. Thanks again for your great work! Dana boomer (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Replies above. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Works for me, I guess :) Everything else looks good, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)