Talk:SS Samuel Huntington/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:SS Samuel Huntington/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

I've left comments, but the fixes are so minor as to be negligible - just don't forget to do them. Good read! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 19:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "British cruiser Spartan was hit amidships and rolled over on her port side and sank with a loss 65 men." typo
 * fixed — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * "on the ways" - I'd prefer this be linked to what "the ways" are. I can figure it out in context, but what if I wanted to read more about it? Wolfpack should link to Wolf pack. On a side note, there should be some disambig tags there...
 * linked "ways" to wikitionary — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * corrected link to "wolf pack" (also added otheruses to that page.) — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: