Talk:SS Tubantia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Specific concerns
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Won't affect GA status, but when was the order for building the ship made?
 * I don't have access to that in English-language sources. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What does GRT stand for?
 * Gross register tons; I had a bad parameter name in the template which kept it from linking, but I've fixed that now. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Neither of these two niggles will stand in the way of GA status. Congrats! Ealdgyth - Talk 13:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to review the article! — Bellhalla (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)