Talk:STED microscopy

IMPROVE
Needs improvement and contains wrong information.See current and older revisions. Also needs citing.Slicky 10:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I checked all of my information against the source you cited. State what's wrong here, on the talk page, so that I can check it. "Abbe's law" doesn't directly relate to this type of microscope - look it up yourself. I already linked to the correct optical terms. "Confocal scanning microscope" is not a STED - A STED is a _type_ of confocal scanning microscope, which is why I put a recap paragraph at the top of the article. --Christopher Thomas 00:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

The dye doesn't have an emission line, but rather a broad spectrum. The nonlinearity of the stimulated emmision process is also of great importance for achieving high resolution.

Math formulas
I put math formatting on the two formulas in the text but not being experienced with them am not certain I got the second one right, especially since the text version was ambiguous looking to me. The second one is also missing an explanation of the symbols used in it -- the first one has these explained. -- Dough34 (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on STED microscopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120204132535/http://www.wissenschaft-online.de/gbm/fall05/homepage/abstract_detail.php?artikel_id=1142 to http://www.wissenschaft-online.de/gbm/fall05/homepage/abstract_detail.php?artikel_id=1142

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)