Talk:STEM pipeline

Untitled
There are quite a few reference links that do not work or lead to pages that no longer exist which is an issue. Alexjacullo (talk) 17:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chhristtian. Peer reviewers: Chhristtian.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Addition to Public reaction
Hi there! There's a small addition I'd like to request for this page to add in mention of "new-collar workers". This term has emerged relatively recently and gained coverage in secondary sourcing, so I'm wondering if it's appropriate to add into this article. As a quick note of disclosure, I have a financial COI as I am here on behalf of IBM (which coined the term) via Vianovo, as part of my work at Beutler Ink, so I prefer not to edit articles directly and am looking for editors to review my suggestion and add it if it seems reasonable.

The following is my proposed addition, to include within the Public reactions section:


 * Many of these pathways support what have come to be known as new collar jobs, in which workers develop the skills to work in the modern, rapidly changing technology industry through non-traditional education paths..

In terms of placement, I proposed adding this new sentence after the following sentence: "The linearity of the STEM pipeline concept has been criticized as neglecting the wide variety of possible career pathways, including interdisciplinary studies, intermittent careers, and STEM-informed work in non-technical fields." If this seems like a reasonable addition, I hope an editor will add it into the article. Please do let me know if you have any questions. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 15:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

A similar proposal regarding this term was made and discussed here, where the consensus was that this was a neologism which should await broader acceptance before being used in that article. I suggest that further discussion ought to occur here before its use is decided upon. Regards,  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ   19:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Technical Writing
— Assignment last updated by Kuuleirich (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)