Talk:STS-125/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewing. Reywas92 Talk 21:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Well-written
 * Everything looks great! I went ahead and did copyediting for the article, but there is nothing major.
 * Factually accurate and verifiable
 * The article is very well referenced.
 * Broad in its coverage
 * I can't think of anything missing.
 * Neutral
 * Of course
 * Stable
 * Of course
 * Images
 * They look great! It makes things so much easier when you know they're all PD. If you want you could stagger them so they're not all on the right side.
 * Due to issues with Accessibility because almost all the images are under second-level headers, I choose to right-align images in these types of mission articles to avoid problems for those with low vision. Ariel  ♥  Gold  20:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

This is an excellent article! Let me know if there's anything specific you wanted to be looked at. I will pass this as a GA, and I hope to see you at WP:FAC! Reywas92 Talk 15:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for the fast review, Reywas92! Ariel  ♥  Gold  20:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Media
Would it be appropriate to add more videos from the NASA gallery? It seems like a good idea to add at least one video of one of the Spacewalks. --Resplendent (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with that. It's all public domain! Reywas92 Talk  18:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I would just be sure that we don't overwhelm the article with a gallery of videos. That is what the link to commons is for, to direct people where more videos / images are. Ariel  ♥  Gold  20:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course. I just feel it seems a waste to have a Media section with only one piece of Media in it. (lol) --Resplendent (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)