Talk:SUSTAIN (military)

Problems

 * 1) It's not orbital, it's suborbital.  The difference is an order of magnitude for speed, and several for energy. (Mach 3 vs. Mach 20)
 * 2) The vehicle is not intended to extract them.  Extraction is very specifically left to other means.

I've made the changes to address this. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 09:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Are they going to make them lifting bodies? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.88.184 (talk) 01:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Space Marines
Why is there a link to the Warhammer 40k space marines in this article? It is unrelated, and if we are going to add fantasy stories as well, Starship Troopers imo would be a more apt fit as they are humans using the similar technology, but again, that is still personal opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocrates (talk • contribs) 02:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC) No, halo orbital drop shock troopers is better118.136.5.186 (talk) 03:05, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Broken Links
Just about every link is broken except for the "Why We Must Sustain..." one and the February 2006 article from The Space Review. 173.52.242.194 (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on SUSTAIN (military). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.popsci.com/popsci/printerfriendly/aviationspace/f2c1d65a5f59f010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:43, 5 May 2016 (UTC)