Talk:SWAP-200

As far as notability it has a whole chapter on it in the Psychodynamic_Diagnostic_Manual Lyo (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Evidence of notability needs to be included in the article. At the moment, it has nothing but a link to its website and publications by its authors. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Article needs better references
The article lacks inline citations and the issue has been noted since January 2017.

Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, all of its references are quite old (1999-2012) and published before the DSM-5 (May 2013), and all of them are co-authored by the creators of the test, and might not back the reliability and validity claims in the article. I do not have domain knowledge in this area, but I believe better references (more recent and by independent authors) will greatly improve the article. Mansci (talk) 12:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)