Talk:SWK

I'd prefer it say "SWK may refer to" on terms of brevity and the manual of style. (Also, on that strain, I suggest removing the extra links.) Since I don't feel like reverting, I'm posting here. --Iamunknown 05:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Good idea re: the title. Didn't mean to entirely revert you, I just had the order alphabetized already and didn't feel like screwing around with it again :) FCYTravis 05:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Good idea about the disambig, I didn't realize there were more. :)  --Iamunknown 05:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

That was fast, and collaborative! Cool ... --Iamunknown 05:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC) The wiki concept rocks!