Talk:Sa Huỳnh culture

Sourcing
removing sources and interpret the meaning without guidelines from book references and replace it with your own ideas are illegal in wiki standards specially to playful INODNESIAN USERS (49.149.101.1 (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC))

Philippines
I would like to address the sources about the existence of this culture in the Philippine islands by means of this book.

(Sa Huynh produced ear ornaments have been found in archaeological sites in Central Thailand, Taiwan (Orchid Island), and in the Philippines, in the Palawan Tabon Caves. In Kalanay Cave in Masbate, the artifacts are of "Sa Huyun-Kalanay" pottery complex site and were dated 400BC–1500 AD. Sources: Solheim, William (1969). "Prehistoric Archaeology in Eastern Mainland Southeast Asia and the Philippines". Asian Perspectives. 3: 97–108. hdl:10125/19126.) you can verify this book mentioned. (Enola gay0 (talk) 22:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC))

Two problems: That's not what the source says, and the source is nearly fifty years old. Sumanuil (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * so what does it mean if they where over 50 y/o or so? Does any update about that please state it, if not i will have a thought for this is all about

"pushing for new theory" by other members, plus i think you had been instructed by a user from who always remove Philippines on credentials in asian articles actually  hes using differnt ip addresses and hounding other members.(Enola gay0 (talk) 12:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC))

Their artifacts may have gotten there. That doesn't mean they did. There's this thing called 'trade', you know. Sumanuil (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)