Talk:Saatva

Cleanup
I'm cleaning the article now to remove the marketing speak. I'm running into issues where some of the sources don't actually back up the claims, such as the Forbes list. The link in question does mention the company, but isn't about the Forbes list. Also, some of the links, like the Internet Retailer list, aren't really the type that would show notability. I've never really seen this list seen as a big notability giving thing on Wikipedia - this is mostly because there are many, many lists of this nature on the Internet. Still, this is mostly an aside since so far I do see enough to where this company does look to be notable. It just needs cleaning to ensure that it's neutral and accurate. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, this source isn't really all that usable as a source since it's a HuffPo blog (almost never seen as a RS) and the person who wrote it specializes in digital marketing, especially to small businesses. This means that there's an extremely high likelihood that this was something purchased by Saatva to promote their brand. As such, I'm going to remove it from the article but put it in the external links section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)