Talk:Sabancı Merkez Camii

NSA/Turkey Sigint collection
According to a top secret information paper stamped April 15, 2013, published jointly by The Intercept and Der Spiegel, NSA and Turkey are operating a SIGINT collection site on the grounds of this mosque.

--Paulmd199 (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Armenian cemetery hoax
"The Mosque was constructed upon a confiscated Armenian cemetery" phrase's sources are extremely unreliable. Source [4]: "Sosyalist Mezopotamya" in Turkish, meaning "Socialist Mesopotamia". This information from source titled [5]: "The process of the Armenians' wealth seizing in Turkey" and from the section named "Discussion on Armenian property and the government steps", a "discussion" can not be a source, also the article is very biased according to Turkish sources, from the article: "...during and after Genocide...", you know Turkish sources does not accept such statement. Also this is a Turkish mosque. Also I am from Adana, and I know the area, there was no cemetery there, neither Armenian nor Turkish, or any other. The mosque place is literally heart of Adana, so central. I mean the name is showing it also. You can see it if you go to Adana or you can check it from Google Earth. So it is impossible. Source [6]: "Hristiyan Gazete" in Turkish. Meaning: "Christian Gasette". I suggest to remove the phrase from this central Turkish mosque in Adana's heart. KARA (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * How can a source be unreliable simply because it uses the term 'genocide'? Also, please explain, for example, how a source published by the International Center for Human Development is unreliable? If your response does not comply without a basic understanding of WP:RS, I will have to remove the tag you've placed. Étienne Dolet (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm also having trouble seeing these sources as unreliable. I recommended making a post over at WP:RSN if you disagree Kara. Winner 42 Talk to me!  00:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)