Talk:Sabina Matos

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Sabina Matos.jpg

Criminal investigation into Matos's nomination papers…
…since the nominees include dead people, as well as people who’ve moved away, although some are allegedly legit ;-) Shouldn’t this be in the article?  Too many sources to count are reporting this.  Boscaswell   talk  07:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Let's wait and see. If she still makes the ballot and is not found to have had any personal involvement or knowledge about false signatures being submitted, it doesn't pass the WP:10YT. If she is found liable by an investigation or is disqualified from the ballot, then it would. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

There should be an update to the article indicating that the Board of Elections voted to subpoena all 11 of the individuals who signed Matos' nomination papers. If they refuse to show up, they will be in contempt and possibly jailed. If they refuse to speak or plead the 5th, the Board of Elections will throw out the enter page of signatures. When this happens, it is likely that Matos will not have enough signatures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astigmatismsurvivor (talk • contribs) 18:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Beware of WP:RECENTISM and WP:OR. She has enough valid signatures. From the Associated Press yesterday, "Election board finds no pattern of nomination signature fraud in Rhode Island US House race". Despite the alleged fraud, the board confirmed that Matos’s campaign had collected more than enough voter signatures to qualify for the Sept. 5 primary ballot to seek the Democratic nomination in the race to succeed former Rep. David Cicilline. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)