Talk:Sacituzumab govitecan

Results in mTNBC for Development
announces encouraging results for mTNBC. How to summarise ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You don't. It's a press release of unpublished, non-vetted results. It's not salient or reliable information nor is the source reliable, let alone WP:MEDRS. Rhode Island Red (talk) 17:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Administration Section
Hey I noticed that you removed a substantial portion of my edits, mentioning that the source I used (drugs.com), is not a reliable WP:MEDRS source. If you look on the drugs.com website, you'll find that it gathers information from two large credible databases (Lexicomp and Micromedex.) Additionally, according to WP:PHARM, drugs.com is classified as a reliable source. With these thoughts in mind, I went back and added my edits on the administration section. Thank you for also catching the incorrect pronoun use in my edits, and I went back to fix those errors when I added the section on administration. Coffeeking123 (talk) 21:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I removed the content because we don't include dosing and related text in the articles about medications. See WP:MEDMOS, WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:MEDICAL. --Whywhenwhohow (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know! Just to clarify, did you remove those edits under the thought process that providing dosing information of the drug could be interpreted as instructional (which violates policy)? When I added those edits regarding the typical dosing information, I thought that it would not be classified as such because this information came from the drug page itself and was more so a detail on how the drug is typically used in practice. Please let me know your thoughts. Coffeeking123 (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Both of those things. See WP:MEDMOS and WP:NOTGUIDE --Whywhenwhohow (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)