Talk:Sacred Cod/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk · contribs) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

GA Review
Hello! Please remove red links from the article. Looks like well-written and well-structured article. Detailed analysis coming up next week. All the best! Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi. thanks for committing to review this article. According to the linking section in the manual of style red links are absolutely fine in an article as long as there is a real chance the article will be created in the future and that the future article is significant to the article at hand. The one redlink I have, the Plymouth Land Company fulfills these criteria.--Found5dollar (talk) 12:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Needed your comment for the red links. I wanted to make sure that it wasn't a dead link or a wrongly put up link.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Quality of article is good.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * MoS compliant.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * This section is good.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Each statement has at least one reliable reference.
 * C. No original research:
 * No original research found.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * All major aspects of the topic are covered.
 * B. Focused:
 * Article remains focused on the topic throughout.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias found.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * No problem with images
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Appropriate Images provided
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass 17 June 2012
 * Listing it under Arts and architecture Section

Comments
Well written article. Good Job.Vaibhavgupta1989 (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)