Talk:Saegusa–Ito oxidation/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The article is well enough written that I can follow it with my knowledge of Chemistry from an A-level over forty years ago.
 * It follows the Chemistry project guidelines and Manual of Style.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References appear to be RS and check out. I assume good faith for those which I cannot access. Citations follow SCG
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * As far as I can determine, it is broad and focussed.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I note that it is suggested on the file pages that .png images should be rendered as vector graphics, but that is not a GA requirement.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I believe that this passes muster. I am happy to list it as a good article, congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I believe that this passes muster. I am happy to list it as a good article, congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)