Talk:Sagi Haviv

"Called a "logo prodigy" by The New Yorker,[2] and a "wunderkind" by Out magazine"
It appears in the lead section. Does it follow neutrality guidelines? Tomer T (talk) 22:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Since it is quoting and referencing established independent sources it seems to be legitimate. ABCDian (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't question the "factual accuracy" of these statements, because they are indeed quotes, but in order to present the article's subject with proper neutrality, they shouldn't be so emphasized in the leading section. Tomer T (talk) 10:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)