Talk:Sahara Forest Project

Is there any data on the long-term impact this may have on the ocean/sea? It sounds like a fantastic idea, but will we end up killing more than we save?

Sahara Forest Project: Investigation of potential copyright issue
RE message: The previous content of this page or section has been identified as posing a potential copyright issue, as a copy or modification of the text from the source(s) below, and is now listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems (listing): http://saharaforestproject.com/fileadmin/uploads/press_releases/SFP-PM-11012011-2.docx http://saharaforestproject.com/news/news-stories/sahara-forest-project-and-selmer-sign-agreement.html http://www.yara.com/media/press_releases/1589132/press_release/201202/pioneering-environmental-project-taking-root-in-the-sand http://tedxmaastricht.nl/speakers/joakim-hauge/ and likely others (Duplicate Detector report)

All the links above are public press releases and can be used regardless of copyright. Best regards Ingrid Schiefloe Communication Manager Sahara Forest Project Contact: Ingrid (@) saharaforestproject.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by IngridSFP (talk • contribs) 13:26, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your note. Unfortunately, we cannot accept content from press releases on Wikipedia without verification of license.Per FAQ/Copyright:

"Occasionally, the question is raised about the copyright status of press releases. While press releases are by nature intended to be reproduced widely, there is no inherent permission to alter them or create derivative works based on them, or to use them for commercial purposes. Accordingly, press releases are handled like other copyrighted content. In the absence of explicit disclaimer or permission, these may not be freely reproduced."
 * In the absence of permission as described above, the content has had to be removed. If you are in position to provide that permission, it can be restored later. Again, please see Donating copyrighted materials. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

CEO section lacks relevance
The CEO section of this page seems to out-weigh the value that a reader might get from it. I'm proposing to have that section removed, and have a reference to the CEO instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrVentureWasRight (talk • contribs) 02:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree and just trimmed it down a good bit. The article overall needs more quality references.MartinezMD (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree although I am more of the opinion that the section on the CEO should be removed entirely. I dont really see either the CEO's notability or their relevence to the article generally.--Discott (talk) 10:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)