Talk:Said Al Nasr

Jugement in Belgium
no trace in the jurisprudence (!)--Ymulleneers 18:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Have you tried Nasser or Naser? He was imprisoned at Leuven Central. Intangible 19:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I do not believe in his innocence but I think we should not accuse someone without a serious source. I have tried "grenade", "bomb", "jood" between 1/1/1980 et 1/1/1981 in the jurisprudance of SPF Justice. None of the sources accuse Said Al Nasr.
 * --Ymulleneers 20:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

NPOV
I cannot accept this:
 * The Belgian gouvernement has traded with terrorist. The "libération conditionnelle" in Belgium is a competance of the judicial power wich is not connected to the legislative power.  To affirm this you should take far more fiable sources such as a minister.  In this case, you must introduce the doubt in this declaration.  If he has been  freed, I can see only two causes : he has terminated his penalty or he has been anticipatively freed.  Other possibilities are not legal in Belgium.  So what is it?
 * The Belgian-French family Houtekins-Kets is not a unique familiy but two families. I cannot see the interest their nationalities.

I think you should review this article by your self and not let me do it.

[I suggest you this reading].

I do not want to command you but the wikipedia 's reputatuion depens on your neutral point of view. Please think about it. I will be glad of making your english more english. --Ymulleneers 20:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Most 1990 sources are wrong in detailing the length their captivity. The nationality is important, because the French government also negotiated with Gadaffi, some members were freed earlier then their Belgian counterparts. Intangible 15:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)